@wirestyle22 said:

@coliver said:

@wirestyle22 said:

I have to look up SSL certification on CentOS 7 now. I've only ever done it on our Barracuda SSL VPN which was just an upload. Here we go

I think you need to look up SSL for Apache if you are trying to encrypt ownCloud. I think someone has a guide on here somewhere about it.

I think @JaredBusch has it in his 8.2 guide. I think he did self signed though. I'm unsure of how to do this on linux with digicert or something similar

It was a self signed for the example. but I use letsencrypt myself. Some clients using ownCloud have StartSSL certs.

@scottalanmiller true, looking forward to packages of Plasma 5.6. Running 5.5 now, quite OK but some buggyness 😞

@travisdh1 said in Installing Zimbra Email 8.6 on CentOS 7:

@scottalanmiller said in Installing Zimbra Email 8.6 on CentOS 7:

8.8.9 is out now...

https://files.zimbra.com/downloads/8.8.9_GA/zcs-NETWORK-8.8.9_GA_2055.RHEL7_64.20180703080917.tgz

8.8.10 is now out
https://files.zimbra.com/downloads/8.8.10_GA/zcs-8.8.10_GA_3039.RHEL6_64.20180928094617.tgz

There is also a patch for 8.8.10 as well
https://blog.zimbra.com/2018/10/new-zimbra-patches-8-8-10-patch-1-and-8-8-9-patch-6/

P.S.; While the ability to "pivot" from e.g. alert to metrics to log seamlessly from w/in a single UI is indeed attractive, the time series data model of the PLG stack (Prometheus Loki Grafana) does not lend itself well to "The Tail at Scale" problem.

https://www2.cs.duke.edu/courses/cps296.4/fall13/838-CloudPapers/dean_longtail.pdf

IOW; it is all a lot more complex than one may initially imagine... lol.

@scottalanmiller said:

@Dashrender said:

What's your take on this java utility?

If I recall previous discussions, you're completely fine with server side Java things, it's client side that are horrible.

Considering this is an admin tool, is this good or bad that it requires Java?

Admin Tool = Client Side

So for me, I think it's a bit of crap there. As an admin tool I'd find it one step better than if it was for "generic" users. But in this role, it is still for an end user, just a power user (me.) And I think that any use of client side Java is rather bad. Not the end of the world, but not good. This isn't a new utility, so we can excuse the choice more than we could with a new one. But I'm certainly not planning to deploy it. There has to be better options.

I feel exactly the same way. Was mainly wondering if you did too - and well, you do 😉

@Dashrender said:

Interesting - by that same token, good backup software should not allow you to delete and previous portions of a backup as long as any other backup references files contained in said backup.

i.e. FB - i1 - i2 - i3 - i4

A good backup package won't let you just delete FB and allow you to keep i4 because i4 would be worthless.

But in this case i4 isn't worthless. You could completely restore from it. Just not have the old data from FB. So for DR is really nice.

@JaredBusch Yuck, thanks for the "stay away from".

Wow, that dashboard is sharp!

@gabriel.engel said:

@tonyshowoff Thanks! We are working really hard on the project. I hope you find some time to collaborate eventually 🙂

Definitely, I'd love to work on IRC access eventually, something along those lines.

@Breffni-Potter said:

@johnhooks said:

I have a hard time believing they will be able to secure their own as much as the big companies.

I'm sure the KGB will be part of the process, same as the NSA gets involved with Microsoft 🙂

Much harder to do with open source since people could compile stuff themselves.

It would not be unlikely for the power of this workstation to be comparable to more than the processing capabilities of a fully populated Proliant DL580 quad CPU Xeon server.

@DustinB3403 said:

So it's fair game for personal profit to use the patients...

It really does seem like he's giving away the horse and buggy. But at the same time any improvements they make must also be open to be used by anyone else.

So yeah it makes sense now that it's explained like that.

Right, the whole point is to drive innovation, not stifle it. So many companies get their patent and then never innovate again.

But opening up the patents allows others to innovate, and will likely force Tesla to continue to innovate or die.

Open source has been a very important tool in the operation of many cheaper systems, by cheaper, I mean company's who want the best, for the least. Been there done that. But, we used a Zip program that had a 4gb limitation, probably due to the limitations in place at the time of writing/modification. There were no warnings on its help, or on user documentation. A 6gb structure was not being zipped, Music mostly ITunes. Sure no problem there, just the Owners Son. Documentation, patching after the fact? What of limitations as above? Backup's serve well but would not have been needed if we could have stored the dir in a non local storage device. Now testing is as thorough as you can get without knowing all sources modified since the first code was documented, and as above some documentation may not have been known by the author, whoever that might have been. Managers hate not having someone to scream at on the phone if some part of what they have used does not perform as advertised, HA. But still open source fills a void, one that some 'Licensed' code cannot fill. As long as this is true, pioneers will navigate through the code until the 'perfect' fit is found.

Here's a quick version.

https://www.variantweb.net/blog/creating-a-gpg-key-on-fedora-22/

I have it installed. Just dropped the forwarder on the firewall so far. So it alerts me whenever something gets by the first box.... no alerts so far (I'd knock on wood if I could.)

Updated as I figured out where things have moved away from the documentation that I had. The five minute install video is for Stacki 1.x and they have changed quite a bit at the core so that is why the video does not reflect the needs of the current installer. Avoid the StackiQ video for installation.